🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold action to prohibit social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, campaigners, and parents are observing intently to see if this approach will set a precedent for countries abroad.

European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of nations are exploring similar restrictions.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister declaring that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our kids' youth". The policy may be enacted in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect the young from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the identity and age of social media users. The media minister have suggested that an Australia-style ban is "an tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has urged parliament to pass a bill increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has recommended a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Dutch government has recommended families to prevent their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a symbolic resolution demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 except if parental consent is given. Even though it warns of the "habit-forming" quality of these apps, the move does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A clear age restriction is a good starting point," stated a leading MEP driving the measure.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Approach

Across Britain, the government has not ruled out a future ban, emphasizing that "no measure is being dismissed" but maintaining any decision must be "grounded in robust data".

Last year, support built behind a legislative effort to enact limits on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. However, the government pledged to investigate the topic.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after viewing dangerous social media material argues that a blanket age ban may not make platforms safer and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to create products and services that are safe and fit for minors," said a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A Fragmented Picture

Across America, regulation is primarily unfolding at the local government level due to country-wide inaction.

• Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has passed a bill barring children under fourteen from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a rule limiting minors to one hour of social media access per day, with additional use requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed laws requiring parental consent for minors to open social media accounts.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from certain politicians to copy Australia's example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Perspectives

Apart from Europe and the US, other nations are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, international agencies strike a more nuanced stance. The UN children's agency has warned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "might prove counterproductive". The agency highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for marginalized youth and that government action should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to invest in child safeguards.

While this worldwide debate continues, the policies of this nation and its followers indicate that states globally are less and less content to stand by for tech companies to self-regulate.